ANT BITE -- The BMC HypoAppraisal
March 20 The long awaited BMC "appraisal"—sort of---has been released by the City. Initially, upon reading the newspapers last week,Aspenites were comforted by the assurance that the value was only $1.45 million less than the $16.8 million paid in December, 2007. But upon further examination of the appraisal, and discussions with real estate professionals, the City is once again being challenged with the outrageous spin they put on the so called, “appraisal.” (Reminds us of the bogus press releases issued after the Burlingame audits.)
Turns out the “appraisal” was a very nonstandard valuation based on “Extraordinary Assumptions” and “Hypothetical conditions”---not what a reasonable buyer would pay!! And one any bank would laugh you out of the room for presenting.
John McBride, one of the most respected developers and businessmen in the valley, who knows this property like the back of his hand, called the public’s attention to the bogus appraisal in a guest column this week. (His columnis both linked and printed in full below.) And from there, the rocks are being uncovered.
We are not ready to write the Ant article on the issue yet, but given the attention it is getting and the blog entries we have received, we want to make as much information publicly available as possible.
Here’s a link to the Aspen Times article:
http://www.aspentimes.com/article/20090313/NEWS/903139970&parentprofile=search
And the City’s Press Release:
http://www.aspenpitkin.com/apps/news/news_item_detail.cfm?NewsItemID=1042
John McBride’s Column “Fantasy Economics” : (also reprinted in the comments below)
http://www.aspendailynews.com/section/columnist/133284
Mick Ireland’s Rebuttal to McBride:
http://www.aspendailynews.com/section/letter-editor/133319
A copy of the “appraisal”: (large file takes VERY LONG TIME to open):
http://www.aspenvotes.org/storage/HypoAppraisal.pdf
Fair Warning At the Time of Purchase:
http://www.aspentimes.com/article/20071129/NEWS/71128041&parentprofile=search
City Documents at Time of Council approval. (Explanation of $450,000+ per unit subisdy!)
http://www.aspenpitkin.com/pdfs/depts/38/cc.res.097-07.pdf
See the comments below posted initially under issue #28 of The Red Ant “Land Banking Needs a Bailout.” We stand by our conclusions!
Stay tuned.We know that there is much more to learn. The Ant has been asking for a copy of the appaisal every few weeks since late summer, and the City always had some excuse as to why it was not complete. But the long awaitedreport was even more creative than we could have imagined!
Feel free to leave a comment below.
Reader Comments (15)
The appraisal was ordered in September, 2008, almost six months before it was delivered.
I began asking for this appraisal in early October, and was told several times over the fall and winter that it would be “two more weeks.”
The mere delay during a time where appraisers were not busy is perhaps cause for suspicion.
The fact that a “first draft” was delivered and kept from the public, does not give more comfort.
The timing also undercuts Mick’s arguments that an MAI certified appraiser could not be engaged due to the needed timing of the report.
-So, why did the City order this appraisal?
-Why didn’t the City order a market value appraisal?
-What use is this hypothetical appraisal?
-Why should the City have paid a hypothetical appraisal value, and ignored the market value?
-Why doesn’t the City just admit that they paid millions over the market value, and explain why they couldn’t get the property for market value, although there was a willing seller?